Niagara Falls
THE
NIAGARA FALLS REPORTER
LOCAL NEWS  •  LOCAL VOICES  •  LOCAL MATTERS

Seneca Nation to Stop Gaming Payments to State

R
Reporter  ·  March 23, 2017
Seneca Nation to Stop Gaming Payments to State
SharefXin

By Tony Farina

The long and sometimes bitter gaming war between the State of New York and the Seneca Nation ended in the summer of 2013 with an agreement that started casino revenue-sharing payments flowing again under the gaming compact to the three Western New York cities where the Senecas operate casinos–Niagara Falls, Buffalo, and Salamanca in Cattaraugus County.

But while the agreement between the state and the Senecas came in the nick of time for the three cities which had been badly damaged by the loss of the slot revenue from the casinos, it now looks like the Senecas believe they are no longer obligated to pay the state about $110 million a year because while the compact was extended until 2023, the Nation believes the payment terms are not extended and ended in 2016.

The Senecas contend the payments under the compact expired at the end of 2016 and no further payments are spelled out after a payment expected this month that is really from last December.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Seneca President Todd Gates said “the Seneca Nation has followed the terms of our gaming compact since 2002, and we will continue to do so until it expires in 2023.  As written in the compact, the Nation provided a share of our revenue to the state through the end of last year.”  In all, the Seneca payments to state and local governments are believed to have totaled more than $1.5 billion over the past 14 years.

But John Kane, a national commentator on Native issues and a freelance writer, believes the Senecas are frustrated at paying the state for gaming exclusivity in the region that in fact doesn’t exist.

Kane, who hosts two radio shows in New York, concurs with the Seneca position that it is time for the payments to end.  He wrote the following in a recent post:

“There is certainly no question regarding the substantial and quantifiable benefit that the state gained from this arrangement:  over $1.5 billion over 14 years, most of which came in the last seven years.  There are, however, significant questions related to the value of the ‘exclusivity’ the state claims to have granted the Senecas.  Did the Seneca gaming enterprises really have a state granted exclusivity?  Was the state held back in any capacity by the ‘concession’ for which they were paid?  Or did they compete directly with all the tools at this disposal almost from the start? ”

Kane points out the state built gaming facilties at their racetracks, called them casinos, and filled them with slot machines that looked and played every bit like the electronic games the Senecas operated and shared revenue from, writing “they [state] did so clearly within the ‘exclusivity zone’ the Senecas paid so dutifully for.”

Kane also believes the revenue-sharging agreement between the state and the Seneca Nation existed in violation of the Indian Gaming Rights Act since the value of the state’s concession “may be neither ‘substantial’ or ‘quantifiable,’” as the Gaming Act requires.

The 2013 settlement between the state and the Senecas continued the Senecas exclusive casino rights in Western New York but now the Seneca Nation is saying the payments ended after 2016 and are not continued through the compact extension, leaving the door open for municipalities to forge new and more meaningful relationships with the Senecas outside of the grip of the state.  And Kane, for one, believes that is the way the Nation should proceed even as the state works on finalizing the budget with a new question mark about the payments from the Senecas.

Niagara Falls banks on about $17 million a year from slot revenue sharing and would be hard-pressed to replace that money in the current year if the Seneca Nation stays firm on its plan to stop the payments.

The governor’s office says Wednesday it believes the payments should continue, setting up what could be a replay of the gaming war that was settled after nearly four years in 2013.  As things stand now, the Seneca Nation has decided to end the payments and move in a different direction.

Seneca President Gates said in his statement Wednesday that “although the revenue share has ended, we remain committed to being good neighbors in the communities where we have gaming facilities, and we look forward to working directly with them to continue the economic progress of Western New York.”

Niagara Falls Mayor Paul Dyster indicated on Tuesday he has been in contact wth state officials on the action announced on Wednesday by the Senecas, but he had no comment at this point.

It looks like the next move is up to the state as the Senecas insist their action to stop payments is not a violation of the compact because nowhere is it written that any payments are required after year 14.

In short, the Nation feels it has been paying for gaming exclusivity that it doesn’t exist and the Nation does not want to continue paying for something it doesn’t have.

SharefXin

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

More From Niagara Falls Reporter

Craig Bucki Stands Out in Race for Supreme Court, Has All the Tools to Be Strong Judge
Featured

Craig Bucki Stands Out in Race for Supreme Court, Has All the Tools to Be Strong Judge

By tony Farina · September 16, 2026

By Tony Farina I’ve covered many court proceedings and trials in my more than 35 years as a newspaper and television reporter and I want to make the point at the beginning of this story that whether elected or appointed, some judges are fair and honest and many others fall short of the mark. In other words, the word jurist does not convey skill and knowledge of the law; it is just a role that some serve with distinction, and others do not. By definition, a jurist is a person who has expert or thorough knowledge of the law but

Is Niagara Falls Crisis Self-Inflicted? Lots of Questions, Few Answers
Featured

Is Niagara Falls Crisis Self-Inflicted? Lots of Questions, Few Answers

By tony Farina · September 15, 2026

By Tony Farina There are certainly many questions swirling around the mayor’s declaration of a state of emergency in Niagara Falls over trash, blight, and deteriorating streets that was declared back on July 20 and has been extended several times since because, according to Mayor Robert Restaino, the City Council refused to approve contractor agreements. But some observers point to depleted staff at City Hall, like in Public Works and Code Enforcement and other departments, as really self-inflicted wounds that are the underlying reasons work is not getting done in the city. Or is there even more to the story,

NIAGARA FALLS BUILT THE MODERN WORLD ON ITS POWER. IT CAN DO IT AGAIN.
Featured

NIAGARA FALLS BUILT THE MODERN WORLD ON ITS POWER. IT CAN DO IT AGAIN.

By Niagara Reporter- · September 11, 2026

The  Data Center That Answers Hochul’s Objections There was a time when Niagara Falls did not ask Albany whether it was permitted to prosper. The river was here. That was enough. The town had something Albany couldn’t give it. It used what was here. Water. Power. Work. Jobs. Industry. A future. In 1895, the Adams plant took the river and put it into wire. The current went to Buffalo. It changed the industrial world. Tesla supplied the designs. Westinghouse built the machines. Niagara supplied the falling water. Then industries came. Electrochemical. Electrometallurgical. They came because Niagara offered abundant, inexpensive electricity.

Niagara Falls Has Millions of Tourists But Needs to Find a Way to Capture That Wealth
Featured

Niagara Falls Has Millions of Tourists But Needs to Find a Way to Capture That Wealth

By tony Farina · September 8, 2026

By Tony Farina The City of Niagara Falls, N.Y., boasts one of the world’s greatest natural wonders that people from around the world come to see, but despite incredible tourism numbers of more than nine million visitors a year, the city of now less than 50,000 people is still pretty darn poor. Niagara Falls does not have a tourism problem; it has a tourism-capture problem, and the distinction should be a starting point for a serious new discussion about the city’s future. And ladies and gentlemen, that discussion needs to start now. The question is no longer whether Niagara Falls