rico

Sean “Diddy” Combs was acquitted of the most serious charges against him—racketeering and sex trafficking—after a grueling federal trial. Yet when he appeared before Judge Arun Subramanian last week for sentencing, those very allegations determined how long he would stay behind bars. That’s not conjecture; it’s how federal sentencing works. Under current guidelines, a judge may consider uncharged, unproven, or even acquitted conduct in determining punishment, so long as the allegations are deemed “proven” by a preponderance of the evidence—a far lower standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” It’s one of the strangest paradoxes in modern justice: a jury says

A Long Island construction industry whistleblower has filed a sweeping civil RICO lawsuit in New York State Supreme Court, alleging a web of public contract bribery, bid rigging, ghost payroll schemes, and union wage fraud tied to more than $27 million in awarded school construction projects. The case, filed by Vincent Bentivegna – former acting president of US Environmental Abatement Corp. (USEA) – names as defendants USEA, its leadership, and its outside counsel at Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP, along with several associated individuals. According to the 100+ page complaint, USEA allegedly secured lucrative public contracts from the NYC School Construction